Bodge v. Trinity County Sheriff's Department et al
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/2/11 ORDERING that plaintiff may file further briefing in opposition to the motion to dismiss within 14 days of the date of this order; and defendant may file a reply within 10 days after service of any further briefing by plaintiff, after which time the motion to dismiss will stand submitted. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DEBORAH LENORE BODGE,
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
14
No. CIV S-10-1319-MCE-CMK
ORDER
ROYCE GROSSMAN,
Defendant.
15
/
16
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action alleging violations of
17
18
her civil rights. Pending before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 22). A hearing
19
was held before the undersigned in Redding, California, on September 1, 2011, at 10:00 a.m.
20
Plaintiff appeared pro se. John Robert Whitefleet, Esq., appeared for defendant.
The court is most concerned about the issue of qualified immunity. Because it
21
22
appears that this issue was not fully addressed by plaintiff in her opposition papers, and because
23
this is a potentially dispositive issue, the court will provide plaintiff an opportunity to file further
24
briefing. Upon submission of further briefing, the case will stand submitted on the papers
25
without further oral argument.
26
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
3
4
5
Plaintiff may file further briefing in opposition to the motion to dismiss
within 14 days of the date of this order; and
2.
Defendant may file a reply within 10 days after service of any further
briefing by plaintiff, after which time the motion to dismiss will stand submitted.
6
7
8
9
DATED: September 2, 2011
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?