Bodge v. Trinity County Sheriff's Department et al

Filing 29

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/2/11 ORDERING that plaintiff may file further briefing in opposition to the motion to dismiss within 14 days of the date of this order; and defendant may file a reply within 10 days after service of any further briefing by plaintiff, after which time the motion to dismiss will stand submitted. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEBORAH LENORE BODGE, Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 14 No. CIV S-10-1319-MCE-CMK ORDER ROYCE GROSSMAN, Defendant. 15 / 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action alleging violations of 17 18 her civil rights. Pending before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 22). A hearing 19 was held before the undersigned in Redding, California, on September 1, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. 20 Plaintiff appeared pro se. John Robert Whitefleet, Esq., appeared for defendant. The court is most concerned about the issue of qualified immunity. Because it 21 22 appears that this issue was not fully addressed by plaintiff in her opposition papers, and because 23 this is a potentially dispositive issue, the court will provide plaintiff an opportunity to file further 24 briefing. Upon submission of further briefing, the case will stand submitted on the papers 25 without further oral argument. 26 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 4 5 Plaintiff may file further briefing in opposition to the motion to dismiss within 14 days of the date of this order; and 2. Defendant may file a reply within 10 days after service of any further briefing by plaintiff, after which time the motion to dismiss will stand submitted. 6 7 8 9 DATED: September 2, 2011 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?