Bazley v. Gates et al

Filing 56

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/29/11 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 9/1/11 54 are ADOPTED in full; Plaintiff's 11/2/11 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 17 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL BAZLEY, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-10-1343 LKK EFB P M. GATES, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On September 1, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days.1 Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 1 26 The findings and recommendations were re-served on plaintiff on September 9, 2011. To date no objections have been filed. 1 1 ORDERED that: 2 3 4 5 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 1, 2011, are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s November 2, 2010 motion for summary judgment is denied. DATED: September 29, 2011. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?