David v. Lopez et al

Filing 23

ORDER ADOPTING 18 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/1/2011. All claims and defendants are DISMISSED except for Tilton and the claim under ADA. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
-GGH (PC) David v. Lopez, et al Doc. 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. C. LOPEZ, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 7, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DAVID M. DAVID, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-1346 JAM GGH P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 the ADA. full; and Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 7, 2010, are adopted in 2. All claims and defendants are dismissed except for Tilton and the claim under DATED: 3/1/2011 /s/ John A. Mendez U. S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?