Stellmacher v. Guerrero et al
Filing
108
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/14/2020 DENYING Plaintiff's 99 Motion to Compel without prejudice of raising objections to individual responses that plaintiff deems improper. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RICHARD STELLMACHER,
12
No. 2:10-cv-01357-JAM-CKD
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
ORDER
ROBERTO M. GUERRERO et al.,
15
(ECF No. 99)
Defendants.
16
Presently pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to compel responses to requests for
17
18
production. (ECF No. 99). Defendant has filed an opposition, and plaintiff a reply. (ECF Nos.
19
105, 107.)
Plaintiff seeks to compel responses due to defendant’s complete failure to respond to
20
21
discovery. (See ECF No. 99.) However, on February 18, 2020—the same date plaintiff filed the
22
present motion to compel—defendant mailed responses and documents to plaintiff, which were
23
received on February 20. (See ECF No. 105.)1
Because defendant has responded to discovery, although the documents were received two
24
25
days later than the date plaintiff set, the present motion to compel is moot, and is therefore
26
27
28
The court notes that plaintiff was in possession of defendant’s discovery responses on February
26, 2020 but failed to inform the court that responses were received in his supplemental
declaration filed on that date.
1
1
1
DENIED. While plaintiff raises deficiencies with some of defendant’s individual responses in his
2
reply (ECF No. 107), it is unclear which specific responses he is challenging. Additionally,
3
defendant—proceeding pro se—is not afforded the proper opportunity to respond to plaintiff’s
4
arguments raised for the first time in his reply.
5
Accordingly, the court DENIES plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 99) without
6
prejudice of raising objections to individual responses that plaintiff deems improper.
7
Dated: April 14, 2020
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
16.stell.1357
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?