Stellmacher v. Guerrero et al

Filing 108

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/14/2020 DENYING Plaintiff's 99 Motion to Compel without prejudice of raising objections to individual responses that plaintiff deems improper. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD STELLMACHER, 12 No. 2:10-cv-01357-JAM-CKD Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 ORDER ROBERTO M. GUERRERO et al., 15 (ECF No. 99) Defendants. 16 Presently pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to compel responses to requests for 17 18 production. (ECF No. 99). Defendant has filed an opposition, and plaintiff a reply. (ECF Nos. 19 105, 107.) Plaintiff seeks to compel responses due to defendant’s complete failure to respond to 20 21 discovery. (See ECF No. 99.) However, on February 18, 2020—the same date plaintiff filed the 22 present motion to compel—defendant mailed responses and documents to plaintiff, which were 23 received on February 20. (See ECF No. 105.)1 Because defendant has responded to discovery, although the documents were received two 24 25 days later than the date plaintiff set, the present motion to compel is moot, and is therefore 26 27 28 The court notes that plaintiff was in possession of defendant’s discovery responses on February 26, 2020 but failed to inform the court that responses were received in his supplemental declaration filed on that date. 1 1 1 DENIED. While plaintiff raises deficiencies with some of defendant’s individual responses in his 2 reply (ECF No. 107), it is unclear which specific responses he is challenging. Additionally, 3 defendant—proceeding pro se—is not afforded the proper opportunity to respond to plaintiff’s 4 arguments raised for the first time in his reply. 5 Accordingly, the court DENIES plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 99) without 6 prejudice of raising objections to individual responses that plaintiff deems improper. 7 Dated: April 14, 2020 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 16.stell.1357 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?