Hunt v. County of El Dorado et al

Filing 69

STIPULATION and ORDER 68 signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 8/23/2011 DISMISSING Plaintiff's Sixth Cause of Action with Prejudice. (Krueger, M)

1

Douglas E. Watts, SBN 182274

2

1745 Creekside Dr.
Folsom, CA 95630
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

WATTS LAW OFFICES

Stephen M. Murphy, California State Bar No. 103768
LAW OFFICE OF STEPHEN M. MURPHY
180 Montgomery St., Suite 940
San Francisco, CA 94104
Phone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff TANYA HUNT

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Nancy J. Sheehan, SBN 109419
Beatriz Berumen, SBN 271249
350 University Ave., Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95825
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants: COUNTY OF EL DORADO and FRED KOLLAR

BARKETT & GUMPERT
Franklin G. Gumpert, SBN 66051
P.O. Box 661448
Sacramento, CA 95866
Telephone: [phone]
Attorney for Defendants: PHIL CHOVANEC, DARIN LEWIS, BOB ASHWORTH and JACKIE NOREN

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

///
///
///
///
///
///
///

27
28

-1STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION IN THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT,
WITH PREJUDICE;
HUNT V. COUNTY OF EL DORADO, ET AL., CASE NO. 2:10-CV-01367-FCD-CKD

[SEE, PARTIES’ STIPULATION – NEXT PAGE]

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4

Case No. 2:10-cv-01367-FCD-CKD

5
6

TANYA HUNT,

7
8
9
10
11

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS
PLAINTIFF’S SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION FROM
THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT, WITH
PREJUDICE [F.R.C.P. 41(1)]

Plaintiff,
v.
COUNTY OF EL DORADO; FRED KOLLAR;
PHIL CHOVANEC; DARIN LEWIS; KEVIN
HOUSE; BOB ASHWORTH; JACKIE NOREN;
and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.

12
13
14

TO THE COURT, TO ALL PARTIES, AND TO THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:

15

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Fed. Rule of Civ. Proc. 41(a)(1)(ii), the parties to this

16

action do hereby stipulate that Plaintiff’s Sixth Cause of Action for Violations of the Public Safety Officers’

17

Procedural Bill of Rights Act, which was pled against Defendant COUNTY OF EL DORADO only, shall be

18

forthwith dismissed with prejudice, and that Plaintiff TANYA HUNT and Defendant COUNTY OF EL

19
20

DORADO shall each bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in regard to the prosecution and

21

defense of Plaintiff’s Sixth Cause of Action asserted against Defendant COUNTY OF EL DORADO in this

22

case.

23
24

It is so stipulated.
Dated: August 23, 2011

WATTS LAW OFFICES

25

/s/ Douglas E. Watts

26
27
28

By:
-2STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION IN THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT,
WITH PREJUDICE;
HUNT V. COUNTY OF EL DORADO, ET AL., CASE NO. 2:10-CV-01367-FCD-CKD

Douglas E. Watts, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff

1
2
3

BARKETT & GUMPERT

Dated: August 23, 2011

4

By:

5
6
7

/s/ Franklin G. Gumpert
______________________________
Franklin G. Gumpert, Esq.
Attorney for Defendants
PHIL CHOVANEC, DARIN LEWIS,
BOB ASHWORTH and JACKIE NOREN

8
9

PORTER SCOTT,
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

Dated: August 23, 2011

10
11

By:

12
13
14

/s/ Nancy J. Sheehan
_____________________________
Nancy J. Sheehan, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF EL DORADO and
FRED KOLLAR

15
16
17

ORDER
Having reviewed the above Stipulation, and good cause appearing,

18
19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 23, 2011
_________________________________
FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-3STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION IN THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT,
WITH PREJUDICE;
HUNT V. COUNTY OF EL DORADO, ET AL., CASE NO. 2:10-CV-01367-FCD-CKD