Ortiz v. Reynolds et al
Filing
112
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/14/2015 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 110 are ADOPTED in FULL; and Plaintiff's 109 Request for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSE B. ORTIZ,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:10-cv-1380-MCE-EFB P
v.
ORDER
J. REYNOLDS, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On November 7, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire
26
file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
27
proper analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed November 7, 2014 (ECF No. 110), are
3
ADOPTED in full; and
4
2. Plaintiff’s request for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 109) is DENIED.
5
]T IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated: January 14, 2015
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?