Ortiz v. Reynolds et al

Filing 112

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/14/2015 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 110 are ADOPTED in FULL; and Plaintiff's 109 Request for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOSE B. ORTIZ,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:10-cv-1380-MCE-EFB P

v.

ORDER

J. REYNOLDS, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On November 7, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

21

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

22

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed

23

objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this

24
25

Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

26

file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

27

proper analysis.

28

/////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 7, 2014 (ECF No. 110), are

3

ADOPTED in full; and

4

2. Plaintiff’s request for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 109) is DENIED.

5

]T IS SO ORDERED.

6

Dated: January 14, 2015

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2