Ortiz v. Reynolds et al

Filing 85

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/26/2014 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 80 are ADOPTED in FULL; Defendant's 73 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in PART as to plaintiff's claim that defendant caused the delay of a necessary medical appointment on or around 9/25/2008, in violation of the Eight Amendment and otherwise DENIED. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE B. ORTIZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:10-cv-01380-MCE-EFB P v. ORDER J. REYNOLDS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On October 24, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein, 21 ECF No. 80, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 22 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Both 23 parties have filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF Nos. 81, 82. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, the 24 25 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 4 The Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 80) filed October 24, 2013, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 2. Defendant’s June 24, 2013, Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 73) is 5 GRANTED IN PART as to Plaintiff’s claim that Defendant caused the delay of a 6 necessary medical appointment on or around September 25, 2008, in violation of 7 the Eighth Amendment, and otherwise DENIED. 8 Dated: February 26, 2014 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?