Diaz v. Martel et al
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/29/2012 ADOPTING 16 Findings and Recommendations in full; DISMISSING defendants M. Martel and Ram from this action without prejudice. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RANDOLPH M. DIAZ,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
vs.
ORDER
M. MARTEL, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
No. 2:10-cv-1388-MCE-KJN-P
/
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
18
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On January 9, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
21
herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any
22
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither
23
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
1
1
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed January 9, 2012 (ECF No. 16), are
ADOPTED in full; and
3
4
5
2. Defendants Ram and Martel are DISMISSED from this action without
prejudice.
Dated: February 29, 2012
6
7
8
________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?