Diaz v. Martel et al
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/16/13 ORDERING that within 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion for summary judgment. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as consent to have the: (a) action dismissed for lack of prosecution; and (b) action dismissed based on plaintiff's failure to comply with these rules and a court order. Such failure shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Kastilahn, A)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RANDOLPH M. DIAZ,
No. 2:10-cv-01388-MCE-KJN P
M. MARTEL, et al.,
On August 30, 2013, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion.
Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written
opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to
the granting of the motion . . . .” On January 27, 2012, plaintiff was advised of the requirements
for filing an opposition to a motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a
waiver of opposition to the motion. See Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en
banc), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir. 1988).
Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be grounds for
imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of
the Court.” In the order filed [date para 8 USM svc order issued], plaintiff was also advised that
failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be
Finally, Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides:
Involuntary Dismissal; Effect. If the plaintiff fails to prosecute or
to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move
to dismiss the action or any claim against it. Unless the dismissal
order states otherwise, a dismissal under this subdivision (b) and
any dismissal not under this rule--except one for lack of
jurisdiction, improper venue, or failure to join a party under Rule
19--operates as an adjudication on the merits.
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days from the
date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion for summary judgment.
Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as consent to have the: (a) action dismissed for lack
of prosecution; and (b) action dismissed based on plaintiff’s failure to comply with these rules
and a court order. Such failure shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
Dated: October 16, 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?