Alfaro v. Gilbert

Filing 4

ORDER adopting 3 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 7/20/10: Plaintiff is provided with 21 days from the date of this order to pay the initial filing fee of $350.00. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
(PS) Alfaro v. Gilbert Doc. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MIKA ALFARO Plaintiff, vs. MARTHA GILBERT, Defendant. __________________________________/ On June 11, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: ORDER No. CIV-S-10-1404-WBS-KJN-PS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed June 11, 2010, are ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied; and 3. Plaintiff is provided with 21 days from the date of this order to pay the initial filing fee of $350.00. DATED: July 20, 2010 alfa1404.ifp.jo 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?