Johnson v. PD Hotel Associates, LLC, et al
Filing
21
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/15/2011 ORDERING 18 Settlement Conference set before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd, on 10/20/2011 at 10:00 AM. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
PAUL L. REIN, Esq. (SBN 43053)
CELIA MCGUINNESS, Esq. (SBN 159420)
CATHERINE M. CABALO, Esq. (SBN 248198)
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN
200 Lakeside Drive, Suite A
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: 510/832-5001
Facsimile: 510/832-4787
reinlawoffice@aol.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ROOSEVELT JOHNSON
7
R. LAWRENCE BRAGG, Esq.
VITALE & LOWE
9 3249 Quality Drive, Suite 200
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670-6098
10 Telephone: 916/851-3750
Facsimile: 916/851-3770
8
11
Attorneys for Defendants
PD HOTEL ASSOCIATES, LLC
dba RADISSON HOTEL SACRAMENTO, and
13 DOW PRE II, LLC
12
14
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
ROOSEVELT JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
18
19
CASE NO. 2:10-cv-1407 JAM-DAD
Civil Rights
v.
20
PD HOTEL ASSOCIATES, LLC, a
California limited liability company
22 dba RADISSON HOTEL
SACRAMENTO; DOW PRE II, LLC,
23 a Delaware limited liability company;
and DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE,
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
SET SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
21
24
Defendants.
25
26
/
Plaintiff ROOSEVELT JOHNSON (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants PD
27
HOTEL ASSOCIATES, LLC dba RADISSON HOTEL SACRAMENTO and
28
DOW PRE II, LLC (together sometimes “Defendants”), by and through their
L A W O F F IC E S O F
PAUL L. REIN
200 L A K E S ID E D R ., S U IT E A
O A K L A N D , C A 94612-3503
(510) 832-5001
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO SET SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. 2:10-cv-1407 JAM-DAD
-1-
C:\Documents and Settings\HVine\Desktop\10cv1407.o.71511.wpd
1
respective counsel, jointly stipulate and request through their attorneys of record
2
as follows:
3
The parties have recently settled injunctive relief aspects of this case
4
and will be filing a Consent Decree and Proposed Order reflecting this settlement.
5
The parties believe that there is a good likelihood that the assistance of an
6
experienced magistrate judge would contribute to an early settlement of the
7
remaining issues of damages, attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, and costs.
8
Based on the above, the parties hereby agree and stipulate to a
9
settlement conference being set in this case before assigned Magistrate Judge
10
Dale A. Drozd as soon as possible. Pursuant to Local Rule 270(b), the parties
11
expressly waive any claim of disqualification and agree to have Judge Drozd
12
continue to act as Magistrate in this action thereafter.
13
14
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
15
16
Dated: July 6, 2011
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN
17
/s/ Catherine M. Cabalo
By: CATHERINE M. CABALO
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ROOSEVELT JOHNSON
18
19
20
21
22
Dated: July 6, 2011
VITALE & LOWE
23
/s/ R. Lawrence Bragg
By: R. LAWRENCE BRAGG
Attorneys for Defendants
PD HOTEL ASSOCIATES, LLC
dba RADISSON HOTEL SACRAMENTO, and
DOW PRE II, LLC
24
25
26
27
28
L A W O F F IC E S O F
PAUL L. REIN
200 L A K E S ID E D R ., S U IT E A
O A K L A N D , C A 94612-3503
(510) 832-5001
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO SET SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. 2:10-cv-1407 JAM-DAD
-2-
C:\Documents and Settings\HVine\Desktop\10cv1407.o.71511.wpd
1
2
3
4
5
ORDER
Good cause having been shown, the Court grants the parties’
stipulation and request to set a settlement conference in this case on October 20,
2011 at 10:00 a.m. with Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: 7/15/2011
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
Honorable JOHN A. MENDEZ
United States District Court Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
L A W O F F IC E S O F
PAUL L. REIN
200 L A K E S ID E D R ., S U IT E A
O A K L A N D , C A 94612-3503
(510) 832-5001
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO SET SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. 2:10-cv-1407 JAM-DAD
-3-
C:\Documents and Settings\HVine\Desktop\10cv1407.o.71511.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?