Johnson v. PD Hotel Associates, LLC, et al

Filing 21

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/15/2011 ORDERING 18 Settlement Conference set before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd, on 10/20/2011 at 10:00 AM. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 PAUL L. REIN, Esq. (SBN 43053) CELIA MCGUINNESS, Esq. (SBN 159420) CATHERINE M. CABALO, Esq. (SBN 248198) LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN 200 Lakeside Drive, Suite A Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: 510/832-5001 Facsimile: 510/832-4787 reinlawoffice@aol.com Attorneys for Plaintiff ROOSEVELT JOHNSON 7 R. LAWRENCE BRAGG, Esq. VITALE & LOWE 9 3249 Quality Drive, Suite 200 Rancho Cordova, CA 95670-6098 10 Telephone: 916/851-3750 Facsimile: 916/851-3770 8 11 Attorneys for Defendants PD HOTEL ASSOCIATES, LLC dba RADISSON HOTEL SACRAMENTO, and 13 DOW PRE II, LLC 12 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 ROOSEVELT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, 18 19 CASE NO. 2:10-cv-1407 JAM-DAD Civil Rights v. 20 PD HOTEL ASSOCIATES, LLC, a California limited liability company 22 dba RADISSON HOTEL SACRAMENTO; DOW PRE II, LLC, 23 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SET SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 21 24 Defendants. 25 26 / Plaintiff ROOSEVELT JOHNSON (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants PD 27 HOTEL ASSOCIATES, LLC dba RADISSON HOTEL SACRAMENTO and 28 DOW PRE II, LLC (together sometimes “Defendants”), by and through their L A W O F F IC E S O F PAUL L. REIN 200 L A K E S ID E D R ., S U IT E A O A K L A N D , C A 94612-3503 (510) 832-5001 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SET SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. 2:10-cv-1407 JAM-DAD -1- C:\Documents and Settings\HVine\Desktop\10cv1407.o.71511.wpd 1 respective counsel, jointly stipulate and request through their attorneys of record 2 as follows: 3 The parties have recently settled injunctive relief aspects of this case 4 and will be filing a Consent Decree and Proposed Order reflecting this settlement. 5 The parties believe that there is a good likelihood that the assistance of an 6 experienced magistrate judge would contribute to an early settlement of the 7 remaining issues of damages, attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, and costs. 8 Based on the above, the parties hereby agree and stipulate to a 9 settlement conference being set in this case before assigned Magistrate Judge 10 Dale A. Drozd as soon as possible. Pursuant to Local Rule 270(b), the parties 11 expressly waive any claim of disqualification and agree to have Judge Drozd 12 continue to act as Magistrate in this action thereafter. 13 14 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 15 16 Dated: July 6, 2011 LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN 17 /s/ Catherine M. Cabalo By: CATHERINE M. CABALO Attorneys for Plaintiff ROOSEVELT JOHNSON 18 19 20 21 22 Dated: July 6, 2011 VITALE & LOWE 23 /s/ R. Lawrence Bragg By: R. LAWRENCE BRAGG Attorneys for Defendants PD HOTEL ASSOCIATES, LLC dba RADISSON HOTEL SACRAMENTO, and DOW PRE II, LLC 24 25 26 27 28 L A W O F F IC E S O F PAUL L. REIN 200 L A K E S ID E D R ., S U IT E A O A K L A N D , C A 94612-3503 (510) 832-5001 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SET SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. 2:10-cv-1407 JAM-DAD -2- C:\Documents and Settings\HVine\Desktop\10cv1407.o.71511.wpd 1 2 3 4 5 ORDER Good cause having been shown, the Court grants the parties’ stipulation and request to set a settlement conference in this case on October 20, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. with Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: 7/15/2011 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ Honorable JOHN A. MENDEZ United States District Court Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 L A W O F F IC E S O F PAUL L. REIN 200 L A K E S ID E D R ., S U IT E A O A K L A N D , C A 94612-3503 (510) 832-5001 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SET SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. 2:10-cv-1407 JAM-DAD -3- C:\Documents and Settings\HVine\Desktop\10cv1407.o.71511.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?