Dixon v. LaRosa, et al

Filing 104

ORDER and REVISED SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/15/13 ORDERING that Plaintiffs request for an extension of time (dkt. no. 103 ) is GRANTED; Plaintiff is granted 45 days from the date of this order in which to file a reply; The Clerk of the Court is directed to change plaintiffs address as set forth in the motion (dkt. no. 103 ); and The pretrial motions deadline is continued from May 8, 2013, to July 8, 2013.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL STEVE DIXON, Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 No. 2:10-cv-1441 GEB KJN P S. LAROSA, ORDER AND REVISED Defendants. 14 SCHEDULING ORDER / 15 Plaintiff has filed his second request for an extension of time to file a reply to 16 17 defendants’ response. Good cause appearing, the request is granted. No further extensions of 18 time will be granted. Because this revised deadline will exceed the pretrial motions deadline, the 19 pretrial motions deadline is continued from May 8, 2013, to July 8, 2013. Plaintiff is reminded of his obligation to notify the court and opposing counsel 20 21 each and every time his address changes. See L.R. 182(f). A party’s failure to inform the court 22 of a change of address may result in the imposition of sanctions including dismissal of the action. 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time (dkt. no. 103) is granted; 25 2. Plaintiff is granted forty-five days from the date of this order in which to file a 26 reply; 1 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to change plaintiff’s address as set forth in 1 2 the motion (dkt. no. 103); and 4. The pretrial motions deadline is continued from May 8, 2013, to July 8, 2013. 3 4 DATED: April 15, 2013 5 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 dixo1441.36.sec 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?