Dixon v. LaRosa, et al

Filing 71

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/8/11 ORDERING that Plaintiffs 68 motion to withdraw defendant Gamez is granted; Plaintiffs claims against defendant Gamez are dismissed with prejudice; and Clerk of the Court shall terminate the 62 motion to dismiss filed by defendant Gamez. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL STEVE DIXON, Plaintiff, 11 12 vs. 13 No. 2:10-cv-1441 GEB KJN P S. LAROSA, et al., Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 On October 31, 2011, plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, 16 17 requested that defendant Gamez be dismissed from this action because plaintiff’s claims against 18 defendant Gamez are not cognizable civil rights claims. On October 31, 2011, defendant Gamez 19 filed a statement of non-opposition to the dismissal of defendant Gamez with prejudice. 20 Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff’s request shall be 21 honored. This dismissal renders defendant Gamez’ motion to dismiss moot. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 23 1. Plaintiff’s October 31, 2011 motion to withdraw defendant Gamez (dkt. no. 24 68) is granted; 2. Plaintiff’s claims against defendant Gamez are dismissed with prejudice; and 25 26 //// 1 3. The Clerk of the Court shall terminate the September 6, 2011 motion to 1 2 dismiss filed by defendant Gamez. (Dkt. No. 62.) 3 DATED: November 8, 2011 4 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 dixo1441.59 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?