Bowen v. Hegpeth et al

Filing 28

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/30/2012 DENYING, without prejudice, petitioner's 27 request for appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

WAYNE LEE BOWEN,

10

Petitioner,

11
12
13

vs.
A. HEGPETH, et al.,
Respondents.

14
15

No. CIV-S-10-1454 WBS CKD P

ORDER
/

Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no

16

absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d

17

453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at

18

any stage of the case “if the interests of justice so require.” See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing

19

§ 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be

20

served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

21

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s March 19, 2012 request

22

for appointment of counsel (Docket No. 27) is denied without prejudice to a renewal of the

23

motion at a later stage of the proceedings.

24
25
26

Dated: March 30, 2012
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE