Nguyen v. Bartos, et al
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/19/11 GRANTING 26 Motion to modify the scheduling order; The discovery cut-off date is extended for 30 days from the date of this order so that defendants may depose plaintiffs newly identified inmate witness. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
TRI D. NGUYEN,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
No. 2: 10-cv-1461 WBS KJN P
BARTOS, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
ORDER
/
16
Pending before the court is defendants’ March 31, 2011 motion to modify the
17
scheduling order. Defendants request that the April 8, 2011 discovery cut-off date be extended
18
for thirty days to May 8, 2011, for the limited purpose of deposing plaintiff’s newly identified
19
inmate witness. Defendants state that plaintiff identified this inmate witness in discovery
20
responses received by defendants on March 24, 2011.
21
Good cause appearing, defendants’ motion is granted. Because May 8, 2011 has
22
passed, defendants are granted thirty days from the date of this order to conduct this deposition.
23
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
24
1. Defendants’ March 31, 2011 motion to modify the scheduling order (Dkt. No.
25
26) is granted;
26
1
1
2. The discovery cut-off date is extended for thirty days from the date of this
2
order so that defendants may depose plaintiff’s newly identified inmate witness.
3
DATED: May 19, 2011
4
5
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
ng1461.dep
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?