Nguyen v. Bartos, et al

Filing 35

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/1/11 GRANTING 34 Motion to conduct the deposition of inmate Darrell Gurule via videoconference; Nothing in this order shall be interpreted as requiring any penal institution to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

TRI D. NGUYEN,

11

Plaintiff,

12

vs.

13

No. 2: 10-cv-1461 WBS KJN P

BARTOS, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

/

16
17

ORDER

Defendant Bartos seeks an order from the court permitting defense counsel to
conduct the deposition of inmate witness Darrell Gurule via videoconference.

18

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

19

1. Defendant’s motion to conduct the deposition of inmate Darrell Gurule via

20

videoconference (Dkt. No. 34) is granted;

21

2. Nothing in this order shall be interpreted as requiring any penal institution to

22

obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available.

23

DATED: June 1, 2011

24
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26

ngu1461.com

1