Californians for Alternatives to Toxics et al v USFWS et al

Filing 51

ORDER GRANTING the United States Fish and Wildlife Service's and the United States Forest Service's request for a page-limit increase of up to 40 pages in length signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 4/15/11.(Matson, R)

Download PDF
1 5 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney EDWARD A. OLSEN, CSBN 214150 Assistant United States Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2821 Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 edward.olsen@usdoj.gov 6 Attorneys for Federal Defendants 2 3 4 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 CALIFORNIANS FOR ALTERNATIVES TO TOXICS, a non-profit corporation, WILDERNESS WATCH, a non-profit corporation, THE FRIENDS OF SILVER KING CREEK, a California non-profit corporation, LAUREL AMES, an individual, and ANN McCAMPBELL, an individual, 14 Plaintiffs, 15 v. 16 UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE; ALEXANDRA PITTS, in her official capacity; UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; JEANNE M. HIGGINS, in her official capacity, 17 18 19 CASE NO. 2:10-cv-01477 FCD-CMK (TEMP) ORDER GRANTING THE UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE’S AND THE UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE’S REQUEST FOR A PAGELIMIT INCREASE Date: June 24, 2011 Time: 10:00 a.m. Place: Courtroom 2, 15th Floor Judge: Frank C. Damrell, Jr. Defendants. 20 21 The United States Fish & Wildlife Service (“USFWS”) and the United States Department of 22 Agriculture, Forest Service (“USFS”) have filed an unopposed request for permission to file a brief of 23 up to 40 pages in length. Good cause having been shown, the Court grants the motion. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: April 15, 2011 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO INCREASE PAGE LIMIT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?