Californians for Alternatives to Toxics et al v USFWS et al

Filing 60

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 6/3/2011 GRANTING 59 Federal Defendants a one day EXTENSION of time to 6/4/2011 to file a reply. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney EDWARD A. OLSEN Assistant U.S. Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2821 Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 5 Attorneys for Federal Defendants 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 CALIFORNIANS FOR ALTERNATIVES TO TOXICS, a non-profit corporation, WILDERNESS WATCH, a non-profit corporation, THE FRIENDS OF SILVER KING CREEK, a California non-profit corporation, LAUREL AMES, an individual, and ANN McCAMPBELL, an individual, CASE NO. 2:10-cv-01477 FCD (KJM) STIPULATION TO A ONE-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DEFENDANTS’ REPLY; ORDER 14 Plaintiffs, 15 v. 16 17 18 UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE; ALEXANDRA PITTS, in her official capacity; UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; JEANNE M. HIGGINS, in her official capacity, 19 Defendants. 20 21 Plaintiffs, by and through their attorneys of record, and Defendants, by and through their 22 attorneys of record, hereby stipulate, subject to approval of the Court, to a one-day extension of the due 23 date for Defendants’ Reply. Defendants will file their Reply on June 4, 2011. 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 1 Dated: June 2, 2011 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 2 3 /s/ Edward A. Olsen By: EDWARD A. OLSEN Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Federal Defendants 4 5 6 Dated: June 2, 2011 7 /s/ Peter M.K. Frost JULIA A. OLSON PETER M.K. FROST Attorneys for Plaintiffs 8 9 ORDER 10 Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: June 3, 2011 13 14 __________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?