Martinez v. Rodriguez

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 10/8/2010 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 are ADOPTED in FULL; plaintiff's 8 motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED, and that plaintiff is ORDERED to submit the appropriate filing fee within 28 days from the date of the order denying plaintiff's motion. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
(PC) Martinez v. Rodriguez Doc. 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. YOLANDA RODRIGUEZ, Defendant. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 15, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GILBERT S. MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-1485 WBS GGH P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 /mart1485.804 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 15, 2010, are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and that plaintiff is ordered to submit the appropriate filing fee within twenty-eight days from the date of the order denying plaintiff's motion. DATED: October 8, 2010 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?