Dumas v. First Northern Bank et al

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/28/10 ORDERING that re deft's 7 Motion to Dismiss, the court does not find oral argument necessary and the 8/9/10 hearing is VACATED. The deadline for submission of defts' reply memorandum, if any, remains unchanged. (Owen, K)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 THOMAS STEVENS DUMAS, 10 NO. CIV. S-10-1523 LKK/KJM 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 Defendants. / Pending before the court in the above-captioned case is a motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 7). The court does not find oral v. ORDER FIRST NORTHERN BANK, dba FIRST NORTHERN, et al., Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

argument necessary in this matter. Accordingly, the hearing on the above motion currently set for August 9, 2010 is VACATED. The

deadline for submission of defendants' reply memorandum, if any, remains unchanged. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 28, 2010.