Vaught v. Sandoval et al
Filing
47
ORDER adopting in full 38 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/7/11. Defendant's 32 motion to dismiss and to revoke plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ELBERT LEE VAUGHT, IV,
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
13
No. 2:10-cv-1558-KJM-KJN-P
E. SANDOVAL, et al.,
Defendants.
14
ORDER
/
15
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
16
17
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
18
Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On March 31, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations,
19
20
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
21
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party has
22
filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court thus presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v.
23
24
United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are
25
reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.
26
/////
1
1
1983). Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to
2
be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The findings and recommendations filed March 31, 2011, are adopted in full.
5
2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss and to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis
6
status (ECF 32) is denied.
7
DATED: September 7, 2011.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
/vaug1558.801
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?