Barron v. Martel et al

Filing 63

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 8/29/2014 ADOPTING IN FULL 57 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 47 Motion for Summary Judgment; REFERRING this action back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further pretrial proceedings. (Michel, G)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RONNIE E. BARRON,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:10-cv-1567 WBS DAD P

v.

ORDER

M. MARTEL, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On July 9, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

20
21

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

22

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendants have filed

23

objections to the findings and recommendations. Plaintiff has also filed “Objections”.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this

24
25

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

26

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

27

analysis.

28

/////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 9, 2014 are adopted in full;

3

2. Defendants’ February 21, 2014 motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 47) is

4
5

denied; and
3. This action is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further pretrial

6

proceedings.

7

Dated: August 29, 2014

8
9
10
11

/barr1567.806

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2