Johnson v. Gardner et al

Filing 19

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 12/23/2010 ORDERING that Carmen Mccandlish is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2) as to the complaint by Scott Johnson. This case remains open with the remaining defendants. 17 Cross-Claim by Richard and Nancy Gardner against Carmen McCandlish remain pending. (Donati, J)

Download PDF
Johnson v. Gardner et al Doc. 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952 DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC. 5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101 PMB #253 CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758 TELEPHONE (916) 485-3516 FAX (916) 481-4224 E-MAIL scottnjohnson@comcast.net Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: CIV.S 10-cv-01604-FCD-DAD REQUEST RE DISMISSAL OF CARMEN MCCANDLISH AND ORDER Scott N. Johnson Plaintiff, vs. Richard Gardner, et al, Complaint Filed: JUNE 24, 2010 CASE TO REMAIN OPEN WITH REMAINING DEFENDANTS Defendants IT IS HEREBY REQUESTED by Plaintiff, Scott N. Johnson, that Defendant (Carmen McCandlish) be and is hereby dismissed WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(2). This case is to remain open with remaining Defendants. Defendant (Carmen McCandlish) is dismissed because Plaintiff and this Defendant have settled their dispute. Dated: December 21, 2010 /s/Scott N. Johnson____________ SCOTT N. JOHNSON Attorney for Plaintiff 1 PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL and Proposed ORDER CIV: S-10-01604-FCD-DAD Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 23, 2010 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2 PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL and Proposed ORDER CIV: S-10-01604-FCD-DAD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?