Abreu v. Cate et al
Filing
76
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/18/14: This action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall close the file. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672
Attorney General of California
MONICA N. ANDERSON, State Bar No. 182970
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
KELLI M. HAMMOND, State Bar No. 217485
Deputy Attorney General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: (916) 322-4638
Facsimile: (916) 324-5205
Attorneys for Defendants Davis, Miranda, and Robinson
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
Case No. 2:10-cv-1621 JAM-CKD (PC)
CLIFFORD ABREU,
STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY
Plaintiff, DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
(Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii))
13
14
v.
15
16
MATTHEW L. CATE, et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Plaintiff Clifford Abreu and Defendants Miranda, Davis, and Robinson have resolved this
case in its entirety. Therefore, the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees.
///
///
///
///
///
///
28
1
Stip. Voluntary Dismissal [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] (2:10-cv-1621 JAM-CKD (PC))
1
It is so stipulated.
2
3
Dated:
6-9-14
/s/ Clifford Abrea
Plaintiff,
4
5
6
Dated:
6-9-14
/s/ Kelli M. Hammond
Kelli M. Hammond
Deputy Attorney General
California Attorney General's Office
Attorney for Defendants
7
8
9
10
11
12
In accordance with the parties' stipulation, this action is dismissed with prejudice. The
Clerk of the Court shall close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
Dated: December 18, 2014
15
16
17
18
19
SA2011300513
CLS Blanks for USDC.rtf
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Stip. Voluntary Dismissal [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] (2:10-cv-1621 JAM-CKD (PC))
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?