Willis v. Cassey et al

Filing 22

ORDER adopting in full 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/22/11. Defendants Prunity, Haworth, Dunlap, Quarte, Tennison, Bickford and Barker are DISMISSED, and any claim of conspiracy against defendants Johnston and Hayward is dismissed as well.(Kastilahn, A)

-GGH (PC) Willis v. Cassey et al

Doc. 22

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 15, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARCEL WILLIS, Plaintiff, vs. FOLSOM STATE PRISON MEDICAL STAFF, et al., ORDER No. CIV S-10-1631 KJM GGH P

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
/will1631.804

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 15, 2010, are adopted in full; and 2. Defendants Prunity, Haworth, Dunlap, Quarte, Tennison, Bickford and Barker are dismissed, and any claim of conspiracy against defendants Johnston and Hayward is dismissed as well. DATED: March 22, 2011. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2