Harvey v. City of South Lake Tahoe et al
Filing
109
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/9/14 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, on or before 4/23/2014, why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to appear at the 4/9/14. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANIEL THOMAS HARVEY,
12
13
14
15
16
No. 2:10-cv-1653-KJM-EFB PS
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
ANDREW EISSINGER, CHARGLES
DUKE, SHANNON LANEY, and JAKE
HERMINGHAUS,
Defendants.
17
18
On November 27, 2013, the remaining defendants filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s
19
fifth amended complaint for failure to state a claim. ECF No. 97. The hearing was originally
20
noticed for January 8, 2014, but was subsequently continued to April 9, 2014. See ECF Nos. 99,
21
100, 103. At the April 9 hearing, attorney Thomas Watson appeared on behalf of defendants;
22
plaintiff failed to appear.
23
Local Rule 230(i) provides that “[a]bsent notice of intent to submit the matter on the
24
briefs, failure to appear [at the hearing] may be deemed withdrawal of the motion or of opposition
25
to the motion, in the discretion of the Court, or may result in the imposition of sanctions.” Failure
26
to comply with the court’s Local Rules or the orders of this court “may be grounds for imposition
27
by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of
28
the Court.” E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; see also Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir. 1995)
1
1
(“Failure to follow a district court’s local rules is a proper ground for dismissal.”). Therefore,
2
plaintiff is ordered to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to appear at
3
the April 9, 2014 hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss.
4
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
5
1. Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, on or before April 23, 2014, why sanctions
6
7
8
9
should not be imposed for his failure to appear at the April 9, 2014 hearing.
2. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be
dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
DATED: April 9, 2014.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?