Hart v. PAE Government Services Incorporated

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/10/2010 ORDERING 8 Defendant filed 9 an answer to plaintiff's complaint. Therefore, plaintiff's motion, is DENIED as MOOT. (Reader, L)

(PS) Hart v. PAE Government Services Incorporated

Doc. 10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. PAE GOVERNMENT SERVICES INCORPORATED, Defendant. / ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOHN HENRY HART, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-1672 FCD EFB PS

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action, which was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On December 1, 2010, plaintiff filed a "Motion to Include the Equal Opportunity Commission Files." Dckt. No. 8. Plaintiff states that he moves "to include documents submitted to the commission during the compilation of this case" and contends that "[t]he inclusion will reveal the defendant is fully aware and has already appeared in this action." Id. at 1. Attached to plaintiff's one-page motion is a copy of the service form that plaintiff submitted to the United States Marshal. Id. at 2. //// //// //// 1
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Although it is unclear what precise relief plaintiff seeks in his motion, it appears that plaintiff wants to show that defendant is aware of this action. However, on December 6, 2010, defendant filed an answer to plaintiff's complaint. Therefore, plaintiff's motion, Dckt. No. 8, is denied as moot. SO ORDERED. DATED: December 10, 2010.

2