Stephen v. Kelso
Filing
102
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 09/13/13 ordering pursuant to the stipulation of the parties 101 and FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(a)(2), defendant Wenneker is hereby dismissed with prejudice from plaintiff' ;s first claim entitled "Violation of Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment Rights." This action proceeds against defendant Wenneker on plaintiff's second supplemental state law, claim entitled "Medical Malpractice," and against all other defendants based on the allegations and claims set forth in plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint 91 . At the request of the parties, the discovery deadline in this action remains extended until 10/07/13 to permit additional time for the parties to engage in discovery and further settlement negotionations 100 . (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
JIMMIE STEPHEN,
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
No. 2:10-CV-1678-KJM-KJN (P)
Plaintiff,
vs.
J. CLARK KELSO, federal receiver for the
California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation; CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION; KOU-YING
HSIEH, M.D.; WENDELL WARREN
WENNEKER, M.D.; ALVARO CRUZ
TRAQUINA, M.D.; SAMUEL WILLIAM
MCALPINE, M.D.,
18
STIPULATED ORDER OF PARTIAL
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
FIRST CLAIM FOR VIOLATION OF
PLAINTIFF’S EIGHTH AMENDMENT
RIGHTS
Defendants.
19
20
Plaintiff
JIMMIE
STEPHEN
and
defendant
WENDELL
WARREN
21
WENNEKER, M.D., by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate and
22
agree, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(a)(2), that
23
plaintiff JIMMIE STEPHEN’s first claim entitled “Violation of Plaintiff’s Eighth
24
////
25
////
26
////
27
////
28
////
-1STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE FIRST CLAIM FOR VIOLATION OF PLAINTIFF’S EIGHTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS
G:\DOCS\KJN\Prisoner\step1678.dsms.part.doc-91113
1
Amendment Rights,” is dismissed with prejudice as to defendant WENDELL
2
WARREN WENNEKER, M.D.
3
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
4
HASSARD BONNINGTON, LLP
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
5
By:/s/ Tanya E. Moore _________
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
tanya@moorelawfirm.com
332 North Second Street
San Jose, CA 95112
Tel:
(408) 298-2000
Fax:
(408) 298-6046
9
By:/s/ John A. Etchevers___________
John A. Etchevers, SBN 53411
jae@hassard.com
Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel:
(415) 288-9800
Fax: (415) 288-9801
10
Attorneys for Wendell Wenneker, M.D.
6
7
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff
11
12
Pursuant to the stipulation of these parties (ECF No. 101), and Federal
13
Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(a)(2), defendant Wenneker is hereby
14
dismissed, with prejudice, from plaintiff’s first claim entitled “Violation of Plaintiff’s
15
Eighth Amendment Rights.”
16
This action proceeds against defendant Wenneker on plaintiff’s second,
17
supplemental state law, claim entitled “Medical Malpractice,” and against all other
18
defendants based on the allegations and claims set forth in plaintiff’s Fourth Amended
19
Complaint (ECF No. 91). At the request of all parties, the discovery deadline in this
20
action remains extended until October 7, 2013, to permit additional time for the
21
parties to engage in discovery and further settlement negotiations. (ECF No. 100.)
22
23
SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 13, 2013
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE FIRST CLAIM FOR VIOLATION OF PLAINTIFF’S EIGHTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS
G:\DOCS\KJN\Prisoner\step1678.dsms.part.doc-91113
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?