Stephen v. Kelso

Filing 76

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/22/2012, ORDERING that pursuant to the parties stipulation, defendants shall file a a responsive pleading to plaintiff's third amended complaint on or before 10/17/2012, or within 14 days after the filing of plaintiff's fourth amended complaint, whichever occurs first; and plaintiff's 74 motion filed in pro se is DENIED without prejudice, for the reasons stated in the 72 order appointing counsel. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JIMMIE STEPHEN,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

J. C. KELSO, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18

Case No. 2:10-cv-1678 KJM KJN P
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE A
RESPONSIVE PLEADING OR
ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF’S THIRD
AMENDED COMPLAINT
[PROPOSED]

Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation filed August 16, 2012 (Dkt. No. 75), and
good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

19

1. All Defendants shall file a responsive pleading on or before October 17,

20

2012, to Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint, OR within fourteen (14)

21

days after the filing of Plaintiff’s Fourth Amended Complaint, whichever

22

occurs first.

23

2. In addition, plaintiff’s motion filed in pro se on August 15, 2012 (Dkt.

24

No. 74), is denied without prejudice, for the reasons stated in the court’s

25

order appointing counsel for plaintiff (see Dkt. No. 72).

26
27
28
B URKE , W ILLIAMS &
S ORENS EN , LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
LOS A NG EL ES

LA #4834-7399-6560 v1

-1-

2:10-CV-1678 KJM KJN
ORDER STIP EOT

1

SO ORDERED.

2

Date: 8/22/2012

3

_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6

DEAC_Signature-END:

7

step1678.eot.etc.

8

ad4mc0d

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B URKE , W ILLIAMS &
S ORENS EN , LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
LOS A NG EL ES

LA #4834-7399-6560 v1

-2-

2:10-CV-1678 KJM KJN
ORDER STIP EOT