Stephen v. Kelso

Filing 88

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/22/2013 re 87 Letter ORDERING plaintiff is again reminded that he may no longer file matters in this action in pro se, but must appear through his appointed counsel; failure to abide by this admonishment may result in the imposition of sanctions. (Waggoner, D)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JIMMIE STEPHEN, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 vs. FEDERAL RECEIVER J.C. KELSO, et al., Defendants. ORDER / 15 16 No. 2:10-cv-1678 KJM KJN P Plaintiff has filed with this court a letter addressed to District Judge Henderson. 17 (Dkt. No. 87.) Judge Henderson does not sit in this court, but in the United States District Court 18 for the Northern District of California. Moreover, this court appointed counsel for plaintiff on 19 August 10, 2012, and plaintiff is now represented by attorney Tanya E. Moore. (Dkt. No. 72.) 20 By order filed September 6, 2012, the court informed plaintiff that he may no longer file matters 21 in this action in pro se, but must appear through his appointed counsel. (Dkt. No. 81.) Plaintiff 22 is again reminded of this requirement, and informed that failure to abide by this admonishment 23 may result in the imposition of sanctions. 24 DATED: January 22, 2013 25 26 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?