Herrera v. Gardner et al
Filing
56
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 04/21/11 ordering within 2 days of the classification committee meeting regarding plaintiff's classification and/or placement, regardless of the date of that meeting, defendants must submit f urther briefing explaining the procedures CDCR is taking and will take in the future to ensure plaintiff's safety. For the reasons stated on the record, Monica Anderson, Diana Esquivel and the California Attorney General's office are jointly sanctioned in the amount of $200 for failure to respond to the court's 03/31/11 order. This sum shall be paid to the Clerk of the Court no later than 30 days from the date of this order. (cc: Financial)(Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ARMANDO HERRERA,
Plaintiff,
11
12
vs.
13
No. CIV S-10-1744 GEB EFB P
GARDNER, et al.,
Defendants.
14
ORDER
/
15
16
On April 20, 2011, the parties appeared before the undersigned for a hearing on
17
plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief and the court’s order to show cause regarding sanctions.
18
Upon further consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that:
19
1. Within two days of the classification committee meeting regarding plaintiff’s
20
classification and/or placement, regardless of the date of that meeting, defendants must submit
21
further briefing explaining the procedures CDCR is taking and will take in the future to ensure
22
plaintiff’s safety.
23
////
24
////
25
////
26
////
1
1
2. For the reasons stated on the record, Monica Anderson, Diana Esquivel, and the
2
California Attorney General’s Office are jointly sanctioned in the amount of $200 for failure to
3
respond to the court’s March 31, 2011 order. This sum shall be paid to the Clerk of the Court no
4
later than thirty days from the date of this order.
5
Dated: April 21, 2011.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?