Boston v. Garcia et al

Filing 49

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/9/12: Upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed June 6, 2012, is affirmed. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

ANDRE’ BOSTON,
Plaintiff,

11
12

vs.

13

No. CIV S-10-1782-KJM DAD P

V. GARCIA et al.,
Defendants.

14

ORDER
/

15

On June 20, 2012, plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge’s order filed

16
17

June 6, 2012, denying his motion for appointment of counsel. The court has construed the

18

objections as a request for reconsideration. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate

19

judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the

20

entire file, the court finds that the magistrate judge’s ruling was not clearly erroneous or contrary

21

to law.

22

/////

23

/////

24

/////

25

/////

26

/////
1

1

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of

2

the magistrate judge filed June 6, 2012, is affirmed.

3

DATED: August 9, 2012.

4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2