Boston v. Garcia et al

Filing 80

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/27/2013 AFFIRMING Magistrate Judge Drozd's 74 Order denying Motions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36(a)(6) and to Stay. (Marciel, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

ANDRE’ BOSTON,
Plaintiff,

11
12

vs.

13

No. 2:10-cv-1782-KJM DAD P

V. GARCIA, et al.,
Defendants.

14

ORDER
/

15

On April 24, 2013, plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge’s order filed

16
17

March 20, 2013, denying his motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36(a)(6), denying his

18

motion for a stay, and denying his request to order defendants to provide him with a copy of his

19

deposition transcript. The court has construed the objections as a request for reconsideration.

20

Under E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly

21

erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds the magistrate

22

judge’s ruling was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

23

/////

24

/////

25

/////

26

/////
1

1

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of

2

the magistrate judge filed March 20, 2013, is affirmed.

3

DATED: June 27, 2013.

4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2