Votino v. Martel
Filing
21
ORDER ADOPTING 20 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 07/06/12 and ORDERING that petitoner's 16 Motion to Lift the Stay is GRANTED and this matter is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Case reopened (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
LOUIS VOTINO,
11
Petitioner,
12
13
No. 2:10-cv-1784 MCE JFM P
vs.
FRANCISCO JACQUEZ,
14
Respondent.
15
ORDER
/
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of
17
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States
18
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On May 25, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
20
herein (ECF No. 20) which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties
21
that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days.
22
Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
23
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
25
ORDERED that:
26
/////
1
1
2
3
4
5
1. The findings and recommendations filed May 25, 2012, are ADOPTED IN
FULL; and
2. Petitioner’s motion to lift the stay is GRANTED and this matter is referred
back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.
Dated: July 6, 2012
6
7
8
________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?