Morfidis v. IndyMac Bank et al

Filing 25

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/4/10: The motion of Federal Deposit Insurance Company as receiver of Defendant Indymac Bank to dismiss claims of plaintiff Victoria Morfidis is GRANTED 5 . Plaintiff's claims against Federal Deposit Insurance Company As Receiver for defendant Indymac, FSB, are dismissed with prejudice. The hearing scheduled for October 12, 2010 is VACATED. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
Morfidis v. IndyMac Bank et al Doc. 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 / On August 9, 2010, receiver Federal Deposit Insurance Company filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(1). The motion was set for hearing on October 12, 2010. Plaintiff filed a non-opposition to the motion on September 27, 2010. For the foregoing reasons, the court ORDERS as follows: //// INDYMAC BANK, an unknown entity; MTC FINANCIAL, INC., dba TRUSTEE CORPS, an unknown entity; BLUE MOUNTAIN MORTGAGE, LLC, an unknown entity; JIM BARCEWSKI; LENDING SERVICES, LLC, an unknown entity; SUISUN VALLEY PARTNERS, LLC, an unknown entity; KEVIN BROWNING; MICHAEL FLORENTINO; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, ORDER CIV. NO. S-10-1797 LKK/GGH VICTORIA MORFIDIS aka VICTORIA FLORENTINO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [1] The motion of Federal Deposit Insurance Company as receiver of Defendant Indymac Bank to dismiss claims of plaintiff Victoria Morfidis is GRANTED. [2] Plaintiff's claims against Federal Deposit Insurance Company As Receiver for defendant Indymac, FSB, are dismissed with prejudice. [3] The hearing scheduled for October 12, 2010 is VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 4, 2010. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?