California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Paradise Ready Mix, Inc. et al

Filing 52

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/05/11 ORDERING that the hearing on the 49 Motion to Compel is CONTINUED to 02/02/12 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (GGH) before Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ANDREW L. PACKARD (State Bar No. 168690) ERIK M. ROPER (State Bar No. 259756) EMILY J. BRAND (State Bar No. 267564) Law Offices of Andrew L. Packard 100 Petaluma Blvd. N., Suite 301 Petaluma, CA 94952 Tel: (707) 763-7227 Fax: (707) 763-9227 E-mail: Andrew@packardlawoffices.com Erik@packardlawoffices.com Emily@packardlawoffices.com ROBERT J. TUERCK (State Bar No. 255741) Jackson & Tuerck P.O. Box 148 429 W. Main Street, Suite C Quincy, California 95971 Tel: (530) 283-0406 E-mail: bob@jacksontuerck.com Attorneys for Plaintiff CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a non-profit corporation, Plaintiff, 18 19 20 vs. Case No. 2:10-CV-01801-GEB-GGH STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S PENDING MOTION TO COMPEL; ORDER THEREON Magistrate Judge: Hon. Gregory G. Hollows WILLIAM CALLAWAY, an individual, dba, PARADISE READY MIX, 21 Defendant. 22 23 WHEREAS, on November 14, 2011, Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance 24 (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion to compel (“Motion”) Defendant William Callaway (“Defendant”) to 25 produce documents and amended responses to Plaintiff’s First Set of Interrogatories, First Set of 26 Requests for Admission and First Request for Production of Documents (collectively, “First Set of 27 Discovery”); 28 STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF PLAINTIFF’S PENDING MOTION TO COMPEL; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 1 Case No. 2:10-CV-01801-GEB-GGH 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant shall be collectively referred to herein as the “Parties”; 2 WHEREAS, the hearing on Plaintiff’s pending Motion is currently calendared to occur on 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 December 15, 2011; WHEREAS, Defendant cannot attend the hearing on December 15, 2011 due to unrelated pre-existing commitments; WHEREAS, in the interest of professional courtesy, Plaintiff is amenable to rescheduling the hearing of its Motion to occur on a date that is mutually convenient for the Parties; WHEREAS, Defendant and Plaintiff’s counsel are both able to attend a hearing addressing Plaintiff’s pending Motion on Thursday, February 2, 2012; THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among Plaintiff and Defendant, in the interest of fairness and judicial economy, that the hearing on Plaintiff’s pending Motion be continued and rescheduled to occur on Thursday, February 2, 2012. 13 14 15 Respectfully submitted, Dated: December 1, 2011 LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW L. PACKARD By: /s/ Erik Roper______________________________ Erik M. Roper Attorneys for Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance Dated: December 1, 2011 William Callaway 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 By: /s/ William Callaway_________________________ William Callaway, Defendant in Propria Persona (Electronically signed pursuant to Local Rule 131(f); original signature retained by attorney Erik Roper) 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF PLAINTIFF’S PENDING MOTION TO COMPEL; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 2 Case No. 2:10-CV-01801-GEB-GGH 1 ORDER 2 Pursuant to Stipulation, and good cause appearing, it is ORDERED that the hearing of 3 Plaintiff’s pending Motion to Compel is continued and hereby rescheduled to occur on Thursday, 4 February 2, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 10 11 Dated: December 5, 2011 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows ____________________________________________________ U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF PLAINTIFF’S PENDING MOTION TO COMPEL; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 3 Case No. 2:10-CV-01801-GEB-GGH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?