California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Paradise Ready Mix, Inc. et al
Filing
52
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/05/11 ORDERING that the hearing on the 49 Motion to Compel is CONTINUED to 02/02/12 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (GGH) before Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
ANDREW L. PACKARD (State Bar No. 168690)
ERIK M. ROPER (State Bar No. 259756)
EMILY J. BRAND (State Bar No. 267564)
Law Offices of Andrew L. Packard
100 Petaluma Blvd. N., Suite 301
Petaluma, CA 94952
Tel: (707) 763-7227
Fax: (707) 763-9227
E-mail: Andrew@packardlawoffices.com
Erik@packardlawoffices.com
Emily@packardlawoffices.com
ROBERT J. TUERCK (State Bar No. 255741)
Jackson & Tuerck
P.O. Box 148
429 W. Main Street, Suite C
Quincy, California 95971
Tel: (530) 283-0406
E-mail: bob@jacksontuerck.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING
PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a non-profit
corporation,
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
vs.
Case No. 2:10-CV-01801-GEB-GGH
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF
HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S PENDING
MOTION TO COMPEL; ORDER THEREON
Magistrate Judge: Hon. Gregory G. Hollows
WILLIAM CALLAWAY, an individual,
dba, PARADISE READY MIX,
21
Defendant.
22
23
WHEREAS, on November 14, 2011, Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
24
(“Plaintiff”) filed a motion to compel (“Motion”) Defendant William Callaway (“Defendant”) to
25
produce documents and amended responses to Plaintiff’s First Set of Interrogatories, First Set of
26
Requests for Admission and First Request for Production of Documents (collectively, “First Set of
27
Discovery”);
28
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF PLAINTIFF’S
PENDING MOTION TO COMPEL;
[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
1
Case No. 2:10-CV-01801-GEB-GGH
1
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant shall be collectively referred to herein as the “Parties”;
2
WHEREAS, the hearing on Plaintiff’s pending Motion is currently calendared to occur on
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
December 15, 2011;
WHEREAS, Defendant cannot attend the hearing on December 15, 2011 due to unrelated
pre-existing commitments;
WHEREAS, in the interest of professional courtesy, Plaintiff is amenable to rescheduling the
hearing of its Motion to occur on a date that is mutually convenient for the Parties;
WHEREAS, Defendant and Plaintiff’s counsel are both able to attend a hearing addressing
Plaintiff’s pending Motion on Thursday, February 2, 2012;
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among Plaintiff and Defendant, in the
interest of fairness and judicial economy, that the hearing on Plaintiff’s pending Motion be
continued and rescheduled to occur on Thursday, February 2, 2012.
13
14
15
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: December 1, 2011
LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW L. PACKARD
By: /s/ Erik Roper______________________________
Erik M. Roper
Attorneys for Plaintiff
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Dated: December 1, 2011
William Callaway
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
By: /s/ William Callaway_________________________
William Callaway, Defendant in Propria Persona
(Electronically signed pursuant to Local Rule 131(f);
original signature retained by attorney Erik Roper)
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF PLAINTIFF’S
PENDING MOTION TO COMPEL;
[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
2
Case No. 2:10-CV-01801-GEB-GGH
1
ORDER
2
Pursuant to Stipulation, and good cause appearing, it is ORDERED that the hearing of
3
Plaintiff’s pending Motion to Compel is continued and hereby rescheduled to occur on Thursday,
4
February 2, 2012 at 10:00 a.m.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
10
11
Dated: December 5, 2011
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
____________________________________________________
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF PLAINTIFF’S
PENDING MOTION TO COMPEL;
[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
3
Case No. 2:10-CV-01801-GEB-GGH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?