Bourquin v. Aurora Loan Services LLC et al

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 8/17/2010 DENYING 6 Motion to Dismiss as moot. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
Bourquin v. Aurora Loan Services LLC et al Doc. 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KENNETH T. BOURQUIN, Plaintiff, v. HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC; AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC; DANIEL WILLIAM QUAID; GREGORY EDWARD JACKSON; FREEWILL FINANCIAL CORPORATION; Defendants. ________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:10-cv-01802-GEB-KJM ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT Defendants Aurora Loan Services, LLC and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("Defendants") filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) ("Rule 12(b)(6)"), arguing Plaintiff failed to allege sufficient facts to state viable claims. However, Plaintiff timely filed a First Amended Complaint on August 16, 2010, which is now the operative pleading. See Hal Roach Studios, Inc., v. Richard Feiner and Co., Inc., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1989) (stating an amended complaint supercedes the prior complaint); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B) (stating that "[a] party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course within . . . 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b)"). Since the pending 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 dismissal motion does not address the operative pleading, it is denied as moot. Dated: August 17, 2010 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?