Lum v. County of San Joaquin, et al.,

Filing 151

STIPULATION and ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT CITY OF LATHROP signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/18/15. The City of Lathrop (the City) is DISMISED with prejudice. Each Plaintiff and the City shall bear its respective fees and costs. The case remains open against the other named Defendants. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5

DANA A. SUNTAG, State Bar Number: 125127
HERUM\CRABTREE\SUNTAG
A California Professional Corporation
5757 Pacific Avenue, Suite 222
Stockton, California 95207
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

8

MATTHEW P. DACEY (State Bar #196943)
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL OF SAN JOAQUIN
Deputy County Counsel
44 North San Joaquin Street, Suite 679
Stockton, California 95202
Telephone: [phone]

9

Attorneys for All Defendants

6
7

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13

JERRY LUM, etc., et al.,

14
15
16
17

v.

Plaintiffs,

COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL OF CITY OF LATHROP

Case No.: 2:10-cv-01807-MCE-DAD
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT CITY OF
LATHROP
[No hearing required]

1

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure:

2

IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between all Plaintiffs and all

3

Defendants that Defendant City of Lathrop (the “City”) is dismissed from this case with

4

prejudice. Each Plaintiff and the City shall bear its respective fees and costs.

5

Dated: September 11, 2015

6
7

By: ____/s/ Dana A. Suntag_______________
DANA A. SUNTAG
Attorneys for All Defendants

8
9
10

HERUM\CRABTREE\SUNTAG
A California Professional Corporation

Dated: September 11, 2015

WALKER, HAMILTON & KOENIG
By:

11
12

_/s/ Peter J. Koenig________________
PETER J. KOENIG
Attorneys for All Plaintiffs

13
14
15
16

ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED. The City of Lathrop (the “City”) is dismissed with

17

prejudice. Each Plaintiff and the City shall bear its respective fees and costs. The case

18

remains open against the other named Defendants.

19

Dated: September 18, 2015

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL OF CITY OF LATHROP