Baker et al v. Cameron et al

Filing 63

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/9/2012 ORDERING # 60 that the F & R's are VACATED; Defendants' # 52 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED without prejudice and within 30 days from the date of this order, defendant s shall file and re-serve the motion for summary judgment, accompanied by the attached notice to plaintiff under Rand; Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), plaintiff shall file his opposition within 21 days from the date defendants re-file their motion; any reply shall be filed 14 days thereafter. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JERRY W. BAKER, 11 Plaintiff, 12 No. 2:10-cv-1811 KJM KJN P vs. 13 SOLANO COUNTY, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On September 30, 2012, the district court remanded this case for re-service of 20 defendants’ motion for summary judgment, filed December 5, 2011, in light of Woods v. Carey, 21 __F.3d __, 2012 WL 2626912,*1, *5 (9th Cir. July 6, 2012 ), citing Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 22 952, (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc); see also Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir. 23 1988). 24 The Ninth Circuit requires that all prisoners proceeding pro se must be provided 25 contemporaneous notice of certain requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment. 26 //// 1 1 Woods, 2012 WL 2626912, at *5. The district court may provide such notice if defendants fail 2 to do so. Id. When provided by defendant, the notification must be set forth in “a separate 3 document, served with the moving papers, and state[] that the court has required that it be given.” 4 Rand, 154 F.3d at 960; Woods, 2012 WL 2626912 at *4. These requirements apply to both 5 “pending and future cases.” Woods at *6. 6 Therefore, the July 11, 2012 findings and recommendations are vacated, and 7 defendants’ motion for summary judgment is denied without prejudice to its re-filing, so long as 8 the renewed motion is accompanied by the notice required by Woods, as set forth below. 9 10 Once the motion is re-filed, the parties are cautioned that this court is not inclined to entertain requests for extensions of time. 11 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 12 1. The July 11, 2012 findings and recommendations (dkt. no. 60) are vacated; 13 2. Defendants’ December 5, 2011 motion for summary judgment (dkt. no. 52) is 14 denied without prejudice; and 15 3. Within thirty days from the date of this order, defendants shall file and re-serve 16 the motion for summary judgment, accompanied by the attached notice to plaintiff under Rand. 17 Pursuant to Local Rule 230(l), plaintiff shall file his opposition within twenty-one days from the 18 date defendants re-file their motion. Any reply shall be filed fourteen days thereafter. 19 DATED: October 9, 2012 20 21 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 /bake1811.vac 24 25 26 2 1 2 Rand Notice to Plaintiff This notice is provided to ensure that you, a pro se prisoner plaintiff, “have fair, timely 3 and adequate notice of what is required” to oppose a motion for summary judgment. See Woods 4 v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998). 5 The court requires that you be provided with this notice regarding the requirements for opposing 6 a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 7 When a defendant moves for summary judgment, the defendant is requesting that the 8 court grant judgment in defendant’s favor without a trial. If there is no real dispute about any 9 fact that would affect the result of your case, the defendant who asked for summary judgment is 10 entitled to judgment as a matter of law, which will end your case against that defendant. A 11 motion for summary judgment will set forth the facts that the defendant asserts are not 12 reasonably subject to dispute and that entitle the defendant to judgment. 13 To oppose a motion for summary judgment, you must show proof of your claims. To do 14 this, you may refer to specific statements made in your complaint if you signed your complaint 15 under penalty of perjury and if your complaint shows that you have personal knowledge of the 16 matters stated. You may also submit declarations setting forth the facts that you believe prove 17 your claims, as long as the person who signs the declaration has personal knowledge of the facts 18 stated. You may also submit all or part of deposition transcripts, answers to interrogatories, 19 admissions, and other authenticated documents. For each of the facts listed in the defendant’s 20 Statement of Undisputed Facts, you must admit the facts that are undisputed, and deny the facts 21 that are disputed. If you deny a fact, you must cite to the proof that you rely on to support your 22 denial. See L.R. 260(b). If you fail to contradict the defendant’s evidence with your own 23 evidence, the court may accept the defendant’s evidence as the truth and grant the motion. 24 The court will consider a request to postpone consideration of the defendant’s motion if 25 you submit a declaration showing that for a specific reason you cannot present such facts in your 26 opposition. If you do not respond to the motion, the court may consider your failure to act as a 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 waiver of your opposition. See L.R. 230(l). If the court grants the defendant’s motion, whether opposed or unopposed, judgment will be entered for that defendant without a trial and the case will be closed as to that defendant.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?