Lopez v. M.V. Transportation, Incorporated

Filing 11

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/14/10 ORDERING that the OSC entered September 29, 2010 (Dkt. No. 9), is discharged.(Williams, D)

Download PDF
(PS) Lopez v. M.V. Transportation, Incorporated Doc. 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Defendant. 15 / 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 On September 29, 2010, the court issued an order to show cause ("OSC") that required plaintiff to show good cause why her case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute this action and failure to comply with the court's order regarding service of her complaint. (Dkt. No. 9.) In essence, plaintiff had failed to file with the court notice that she had timely submitted certain required service documents to the United States Marshal. On October 12, 2010, plaintiff filed a timely response to the OSC, which provides good cause supporting the discharge of the OSC. (Dkt. No. 10.) It appears that plaintiff's failure to file the required notice was inadvertent, and plaintiff expressed contrition for her misreading of the court's instructions regarding service. Plaintiff's response also includes the required notice regarding submission of materials to the United States Marshal. 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BECKY LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. M.V. TRANSPORTATION INCORPORATED, ORDER No. 2:10-cv-01822 GEB KJN PS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the OSC entered September 29, 2010 (Dkt. No. 9), is discharged. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 14, 2010 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?