Mitchell v. Williams et al
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 04/04/12 ordering that plaintiff's 03/29/12 request for an extension of time to further file objections to the findings and recommendations filed on 02/08/12 and for the appointment of a jailhouse lawyer to represent plaintiff 29 is denied. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
LACY MITCHELL,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
No. CIV S-10-1829 KJM DAD P
WILLIAMS, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
ORDER
/
Plaintiff has filed a document with the court styled as, “Plaintiff’s Objections To
17
The Magistrate Judge’s Findings And Recommendations; Request For 45 Day Extension;
18
Motion For Appointment Of Counsel.” (Doc. No. 29.) Therein, plaintiff indicates that he has
19
found an “inmate-jailhouse lawyer who is willing to prepare a more effective response that will
20
show why plaintiff’s claims should not be dismissed” and plaintiff requests 45 days to file his
21
“opposition” to the court’s findings and recommendations issued on February 8, 2012. (Doc. No.
22
29 at 2.) In addition, plaintiff seeks the appointment of the “jailhouse lawyer” in question to
23
represent him. (Id.)
24
On March 26, 2012, the assigned District Judge adopted the undersigned’s
25
February 8, 2012 findings and recommendation after conducting a de novo review of the case
26
and taking into consideration plaintiff’s objections filed on February 24, 2012. Therefore,
1
1
plaintiff’s request for an extension of time will be denied as untimely.
2
Plaintiff request for the appointment of his “jailhouse lawyer” as his counsel will
3
also be denied. A non-lawyer may appear pro se only on behalf of himself; he cannot represent
4
the interests of others. C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States, 818 F.2d 696, 697 (9th Cir.
5
1987); see also Oxendine v. Williams, 509 F.2d 1405, 1407 (4th Cir. 1975) (a non-lawyer
6
prisoner may not represent fellow inmates in a class action). Therefore, the court will not
7
appoint another inmate to act as plaintiff’s legal representative.
8
9
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s March 29, 2012 request
for an extension of time to file further objections to the findings and recommendations filed on
10
February 8, 2012, and for the appointment of a “jailhouse lawyer” to represent plaintiff (Doc. No.
11
29), is denied.
12
DATED: April 4, 2012.
13
14
15
DAD:4
mitc1829.31c
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?