Mitchell v. Williams et al

Filing 57

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/18/2013 ORDERING 55 that Steven Allan Whitworth is APPOINTED as counsel in this action; Appointed counsel shall notify, Sujean Park, USDC, EDCA, for any questions related to the appointment; the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and the court's order 56 upon Steven A. Whitworth, Esquire, Law Office of Steve A. Whitworth, Sacramento, CA. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LACY MITCHELL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:10-cv-01829 KJM DAD P v. ORDER WILLIAMS, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 18 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983. On September 3, 2013, plaintiff filed a letter asking for 19 the appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 55) On September 26, 2013, the court found that the 20 appointment of counsel was warranted; plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel was 21 granted and referred to the Court's Pro Bono Program. (ECF No. 56) Steven Allan Whitworth 22 has been selected from the court's pro bono attorney panel to represent plaintiff and has accepted 23 the appointment. 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. Steven Allan Whitworth is appointed as counsel in the above entitled matter. 26 2. Appointed counsel shall notify Sujean Park at (916) 930-4278, or via email at 27 spark@caed.uscourts.gov if he has any questions related to the appointment. 28 ///// 1 1 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and the court's 2 order filed September 26, 2013 (ECF No. 56) upon Steven Allan Whitworth, Law Office of Steve 3 Whitworth, 770 L Street, Suite 950, Sacramento, CA 95814. 4 DATED: October 18, 2013 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?