Turner v. Salinas

Filing 46

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/22/11 denying 44 motion for writ of mandamus. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
(PC) Turner v. Salinas Doc. 46 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. WARDEN SALINAS, et al., Defendants. / On September 22, 2010, the court ordered the United States Marshal to serve the complaint on defendants. Process directed to defendant Vertinelli was returned unserved. On February 23, 2011, the court granted plaintiff sixty days to obtain additional information to serve this defendant. On March 3, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion for writ of mandate. In this motion, it appears that plaintiff is requesting court assistance in locating defendant Vertinelli. However, plaintiff has taken no steps to locate defendant Vertinelli on his own. For example, plaintiff has not requested information from the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ("CDCR") pursuant to the California Public Records Act regarding defendant Vertinelli's address. Cal. Govt. Code 6253. Because plaintiff has not attempted to obtain information regarding defendant Vertinelli, his request for court assistance is premature. 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANTHONY R. TURNER, Plaintiff, No. 2: 10-cv-1848 MCE KJN P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 tur1848.ord(2) Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for writ of mandate (Dkt. No. 44) is denied. DATED: March 22, 2011 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?