Turner v. Salinas
Filing
89
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/2/12 GRANTING 88 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Clerk of Court is directed to locate forthwith an attorney admitted to practice in this court who is willing to accept the appointment. (cc ADRP)(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ANTHONY R. TURNER,
11
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
No. 2: 10-cv-1848 MCE KJN P
vs.
WARDEN SALINAS, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
/
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis, in
17
this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s
18
motion for appointment of counsel filed January 30, 2012.
19
“In proceedings in forma pauperis, the district court ‘may request an attorney to
20
represent any person unable to afford counsel.’ 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). The decision to appoint
21
such counsel is within ‘the sound discretion of the trial court and is granted only in exceptional
22
circumstances.’ Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1236 (9th Cir. 1984). A finding of the
23
exceptional circumstances of the plaintiff seeking assistance requires at least an evaluation of the
24
likelihood of the plaintiff’s success on the merits and an evaluation of the plaintiff’s ability to
25
articulate his claims ‘in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved.’ Wilborn v.
26
Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986) (quoting Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954
1
1
(9th Cir. 1983)).” Agyeman v. Corrections Corp. of America, 390 F.3d 1101, 1103 (9th Cir.
2
2004). “Neither of these factors is dispositive and both must be viewed together before reaching
3
a decision on request of counsel under section 1915(d).” Wilborn, supra, 789 F.2d at 1331 (fn.
4
omitted); see also, Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991).
5
Plaintiff meets both criteria listed above. Plaintiff alleges that defendant Colon
6
violated his Eighth Amendment rights by “slamming” a cell door on plaintiff. Plaintiff has a
7
chance of success as to this claim. In light of the complexity of this claim, appointment of
8
counsel is warranted.
9
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
10
1. Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. 88) is granted; and
11
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to locate forthwith an attorney admitted to
12
practice in this court who is willing to accept the appointment.
13
DATED: February 2, 2012
14
15
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
17
tur1848.app
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?