DeLoney v. Rodriguez

Filing 5

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/15/10 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice re 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

(PC) DeLoney v. Rodriguez

Doc. 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. JOHN R. RODRIGUEZ, Defendant. / By order filed August 3, 2010, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within fourteen days, why his action should not be dismissed pursuant to the Younger abstention doctrine. The fourteen day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court's order. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The Clerk of Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RICKEY B. DeLONEY, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-1849 GGH P

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5

Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: September 15, 2010 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
GGH:035 delo1849.fsc