Kenoyer v. United States Postal Service

Filing 11

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/14/2010 ORDERING that all hearing dates before Judge Karlton are VACATED. The Clerk shall reassign this case to Magistrate Judge Brennan. All future documents file in this case shall reference case number: No. Civ. S-10-1858 EFB. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
Kenoyer v. United States Postal Service Doc. 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PATRICK KENOYER, Plaintiff, NO. CIV. S-10-1858 LKK/EFB ORDER / Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. § 636(c). See 28 U.S.C. According to Local Rule 305, both the district court judge assigned to the case and the magistrate judge must approve the reference to the magistrate judge. The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and recommends that the above-captioned case be reassigned and referred to the magistrate judge for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment. //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IT IS ORDERED that any hearing dates currently set before the undersigned are VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to the Honorable Edmund F. Brennan, United States Magistrate Judge. All future documents filed in the above- captioned case shall reference the following case number: No. Civ. S-10-1858 EFB. DATED: September 14, 2010 /s/Lawrence K. Karlton LAWRENCE K. KARLTON SENIOR JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Having also reviewed the file, I accept reference of this case for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment. DATED: September 14, 2010. EDMUND F. BRENNAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?