Kenoyer v. United States Postal Service

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/15/2010 ORDERING Status Conference set for 11/17/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan; and a joint status report is due no later than 14 days prior to the status conference. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
Kenoyer v. United States Postal Service Doc. 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant. / ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PATRICK KENOYER, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-1858 EFB On September 15, 2010, this action was reassigned to the undersigned based on the consent of the parties, and all hearing dates then set before the district judge were vacated. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 305; 28 U.S.C. 636(c). Because this case has not yet been scheduled pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b), a status (pretrial scheduling) conference will be set before the undersigned. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. A status (pretrial scheduling) conference is set for November 17, 2010, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 24 before the undersigned. //// //// //// 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 matter. 2. Not later than fourteen (14) days prior to the status conference, the parties shall file status reports1 briefly describing the case and addressing the following: a. Progress in service of process; b. Possible joinder of additional parties; c. Expected or desired amendment of pleadings; d. Jurisdiction and venue; e. Anticipated motions and their scheduling; f. The report required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 outlining the proposed discovery plan and its scheduling, including disclosure of expert witnesses; g. Cut-off dates for discovery and law and motion, and dates for pretrial conference and trial; h. Special procedures, if any; I. Estimated trial time; j. Modifications of standard pretrial procedures due to the simplicity or complexity of the proceedings; k. Whether the case is related to any other cases, including bankruptcy; l. Whether a settlement conference should be scheduled; m. Whether counsel will stipulate to the magistrate judge assigned to this matter acting as settlement judge and waiving disqualification by virtue of his so acting, or whether they prefer to have a settlement conference conducted before another judge; n. Any other matters that may add to the just and expeditious disposition of this 3. The parties are reminded of their continuing duty to notify chambers immediately of any settlement or other disposition. See L.R. 160. In addition, the parties are cautioned that 1 The parties are encouraged, when possible, to file a joint status report. 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), opposition to granting of a motion must be filed fourteen (14) days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further provides that "[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party." Moreover, Local Rule 230(I) provides that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules "may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court." DATED: September 15, 2010. 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?