Shepard v. Miller et al
Filing
87
ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 1/11/2012 ORDERING that Defendants' 74 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
----oo0oo---10
11
PAULA SHEPARD,
NO. CIV. 2:10-1863 WBS JFM
12
Plaintiff,
13
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
v.
14
15
JANE MILER, an individual,
CAREER PRESS, INC., NEW PAGE
BOOKS, and DOES 1-100.
16
17
Defendants.
___________________________/
18
----oo0oo---19
Plaintiff Paula Shepard brought this action against
20
21
defendants Jane Miller,1 Career Press, Inc., and New Page Books,2
22
alleging copyright infringement and related state law claims
23
stemming out of defendants’ alleged wrongful misappropriation of
24
plaintiff’s writings on psychiatric service dogs.
Presently
25
26
27
1
Jane Miller is sued erroneously as “Jane Miler.”
at 1:22 (Docket No. 6).)
2
28
(Ans.
New Page Books is an “imprint” of Career Press, Inc.
(Ans. ¶ 4.)
1
1
before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment
2
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56.
3
Plaintiff filed a statement of non-opposition to
4
defendants’ summary judgement motion.
5
statement of non-opposition is filed by “[a] responding party who
6
has no opposition to the granting of the motion.”
7
230(c).
8
the motion.
9
(Docket No. 86.)
A
Local R.
Accordingly, good cause appearing, the court will grant
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants’ motion for
10
summary judgment be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED.
11
DATED:
January 11, 2012
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?