Shepard v. Miller et al

Filing 87

ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 1/11/2012 ORDERING that Defendants' 74 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ----oo0oo---10 11 PAULA SHEPARD, NO. CIV. 2:10-1863 WBS JFM 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. 14 15 JANE MILER, an individual, CAREER PRESS, INC., NEW PAGE BOOKS, and DOES 1-100. 16 17 Defendants. ___________________________/ 18 ----oo0oo---19 Plaintiff Paula Shepard brought this action against 20 21 defendants Jane Miller,1 Career Press, Inc., and New Page Books,2 22 alleging copyright infringement and related state law claims 23 stemming out of defendants’ alleged wrongful misappropriation of 24 plaintiff’s writings on psychiatric service dogs. Presently 25 26 27 1 Jane Miller is sued erroneously as “Jane Miler.” at 1:22 (Docket No. 6).) 2 28 (Ans. New Page Books is an “imprint” of Career Press, Inc. (Ans. ¶ 4.) 1 1 before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment 2 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. 3 Plaintiff filed a statement of non-opposition to 4 defendants’ summary judgement motion. 5 statement of non-opposition is filed by “[a] responding party who 6 has no opposition to the granting of the motion.” 7 230(c). 8 the motion. 9 (Docket No. 86.) A Local R. Accordingly, good cause appearing, the court will grant IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants’ motion for 10 summary judgment be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. 11 DATED: January 11, 2012 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?