United States of America v. Real property located at 3110 Morgan Hill Road, Hayfork, California, Trinity County, APN: 017-430-25

Filing 36

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 1/10/12 ORDERING stay no longer pertinent; on or before 1/23/12, the parties will file a joint status report addressing the matters set forth in the 7/9/10 Order; the Scheduling Conference now set for 2/6/12 at 2:00 p.m. shall REMAIN scheduled as previously ordered. (Meuleman, A)

1

4

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN
Assistant United States Attorney
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: [phone]

5

Attorneys for the United States

2
3

6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

12
13
14
15
16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3110
MORGAN HILL ROAD, HAYFORK,
CALIFORNIA, TRINITY COUNTY,
APN: 017-430-25,INCLUDING ALL
APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS
THERETO,

17
Defendant.
18

2:10-CV-01894 WBS-JFM
STAY NO LONGER REQUIRED
OF FURTHER PROCEEDINGS
AND ORDER [PROPOSED]

19
The United States of America and claimant Jaime R. Serrano
20
(hereafter "claimant") hereby advise the Court that a stay is no
21
longer pertinent in this matter.

As described more fully in the

22
Orders Staying the Case entered on July 12, 2011 (Doc. 31) and
23
November 16, 2011 (Doc. 34), this civil forfeiture case has been
24
stayed pending the resolution of the related criminal charges
25
filed against the claimant in Trinity County Superior Court.
26
The parties now submit that the criminal case filed against
27
the claimant in the Trinity County Superior Court, i.e., the
28
1

Stay No Longer Required of Further
Proceedings and Order [Proposed]

1

basis for the stay in the above-entitled case, has reached its

2

conclusion.

3

further stay in the case, "the parties will advise the court of

4

the status of the criminal case and will advise the court whether

5

a further stay is necessary [within sixty days].”

6

the stay is longer pertinent and the obligation to file a Joint

7

Status Report is now active.

Per the Court's November 16, 2011 Order granting a

Accordingly,

8
9
10

The parties submit:
1.

The grounds forming the basis for the previous stay are

11

no longer present and that a stay is no longer

12

pertinent; and

13

2.

The parties will file, fourteen days prior to the

14

pretrial scheduling conference, a joint status report

15

addressing the matters set forth in the July 9, 2010,

16

Order Setting Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference.

17
18

Dated: 1/10/12

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney

19
20

By:

/s/ Kevin C. Khasigian
KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN
Assistant U.S. Attorney

By:

/s/ Stephen Sweigart
STEPHEN SWEIGART
Attorney for claimant
Jaime R. Serrano

21
22
23
Dated: 01/10/2012
24
25

(Signature retained by
attorney)

26
27
28
2

Stay No Longer Required of Further
Proceedings and Order [Proposed]

1

ORDER

2

For the reasons set forth above, the grounds forming the

3

basis for the previous stay are no longer present and that a stay

4

is no longer pertinent.

5

parties will file a joint status report addressing the matters

6

set forth in the

7

Scheduling) Conference.

8

February 6, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. shall remain scheduled as

9

previously ordered.

On or before January 23, 2012, the

July 9, 2010, Order Setting Status (Pretrial
The Scheduling Conference now set for

10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13

Dated:

January 10, 2012

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

Stay No Longer Required of Further
Proceedings and Order [Proposed]