Knutson v. Jacquez

Filing 9

ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/20/2010 ORDERING the clerk to randomly assign a US District Judge to this action; and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed withoutprejudice. Assigned and Referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr.; Objections due w/in 21 days. (Yin, K)

(PC)Knutson v. Jacquez

Doc. 9

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 prejudice. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twentyone days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RONALD KNUTSON, Plaintiff, vs. FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, Defendants. / By an order filed August 26, 2010, plaintiff was ordered to file a complaint that complies with the requirements of the Civil Rights Act, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS No. CIV S-10-1970 DAD P

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: October 20, 2010.

D A D :9 k n u t1 9 7 0 .fc o m p l

2